91茄子 requests that the Commission grant rehearing or reconsider its conclusion that 91茄子 and other commenters failed to demonstrate that MLPs will not double recover income taxes if they continue to be provided with a tax allowance. 91茄子 further requests that the Commission clarify that, in future rate proceedings, an MLP pipeline will be permitted to propose and present evidence of (1) an income tax allowance that reflects the pipeline’s individual facts and circumstances and addresses double recovery concerns, and (2) adjustments to ROE, or other rate adjustments, that reflect the pipeline’s individual risk factors.
Related
Natural Gas & Power Industries’ Reliability Alliance:
Exploring Real-Life Challenges with Ensuring Natural Gas Availability for Power and Joint Industry Suggested Mitigation Strategies 91茄子 Comments on FERC NOPR on Cybersecurity Incentives for Electric Utilities 91茄子 Incident Reporting Comments 91茄子 API Petition for Consideration of Gas Transmission Final Rule
Exploring Real-Life Challenges with Ensuring Natural Gas Availability for Power and Joint Industry Suggested Mitigation Strategies 91茄子 Comments on FERC NOPR on Cybersecurity Incentives for Electric Utilities 91茄子 Incident Reporting Comments 91茄子 API Petition for Consideration of Gas Transmission Final Rule
